Exactly, couldn't have said it better myself. People don't know what I mean when I say Youtubers have destroyed NBA 2K21 in a way as they are so jaded by fandom. And 2K MT knows precisely what it's doing.I been saying youtubers break rpg based games. Everyone believes that only one build is good. They dont need new cartoons if we are using exactly the same ones. They dont have to fix mycareer (against ai) if no one plays it. Thankfully most individuals are in limbo trying to find out the meta in order that they are predictable and you can get away with off meta stuff. But it still sucks that you cant be a free thinker. We know where they place their money its not even a contest.
Imagine if everybody had to find their own animations and builds? The whole scene would seem different. You have everybody using the same builds and spamming the exact moves because someone else told them to. If everyone had to find their own animations and builds it'd still basically look the same as some cartoons and builds are just better than others. And the folks with the better assembles would win. The meta is the meta name for a reason. Folks don't use two-way slashing playmakers since youtubers told them. They use them because It is the most OP construct in NBA 2K21. I have never shed to somebody working with a small ball or a ball hawk.
I have discovered that comeback before. That facts. I'm glad you mentioned 2 way slashing plays because nobody has been making those at start which sort of proves my point. People today didnt just"stumble" on to that build, they got told by Youtube and it spread throughout the community. People would figure out the most OP assembles whether or not youtube was something. You can go to any point, and choose the builds of whoever is on the maximum streak. I discovered about my current build because I saw some high rep going mad on it at the ante-up and checked his card. In 16 I found out about the demigod 6'7 out without any youtube video.
That is somewhat true. That is why I want archetypes eliminated because everyone just makes the broken and easy to abuse assembles. If everyone had the exact same build it'd just be who's better compared to the sticks. Everyone is the exact same, nobody would ever pick a big because everyone is able to rebound and dunk, the entire reason behind archetype assembles is that you've got selection, strengths and flaws. Yes there are a few builds that CAN do everything, but they're not Great at anything. You want to be a pure sharp or pure slasher, yeah you will score a ton but you are swiss cheese on defense.
You want to be a pure lockdown? You can't actually score that much. Hybrid assembles (2-way slashing playmaker that a ) are good yes but they also are not super consistently good at anything, because their attributes are spread out. If everyone ran the same thing it'd be pointless to pick anything but a PG. Since they'd be better at rebounding, inside protection, and interior scoring Individuals would still bigs. There are builds that may do everything and ARE STILL GREAT AT EVERYTHING. Has lockdown defense, 90 driving dip and all connections fuck with vert and 99 rate and 90 ball controller. Offensive danger is defensively ordinary but great in EVERYTHING on offense.
And what exactly do you mean pure locks can't score? Mine can shoot out lights in the corner, has all touch dunks, dribble moves that are pro, and on top of the best defense out of any construct. Everyone DOES run the thing. Playlocks or rebounding and playlock wing. Or the occasional playshot and large, which is more rare. And in 2K20 it kind of is moot to be anything but a protector, why would I make a slow centre when my lockdown can guard centers AND guards, while being better at everything. No archetypes wouldn't make centers worse. Make bigs better inside and stonger having the capability.
Play stage to get a day against 2 way slashing playmakers who take lights out from the cover of the major, have HOF clamps and intimidator, utilize allen iverson size upward, can easily get by you every time with a hopstep, also have 99 rate and vert. You're at a disadvantage, if you are not one. 1 thing NBA Live (RIP in peace) did really well was the archetype system. You could be a protector, a wing, or even a large. Each place had 3 archetypes to pick from, and each archetype had two specializations (a defensive wing would go the Kawhi path or the Pippen path, by way of instance ). You can cater each construct even further for your playstyle with badges, but all builds were workable because of the smaller amount of them. You literally could not make a mistake if you tried. And when you did, it was easy to level a brand new one up.
So much less sweat because game.I played that match and it did a fairly good job on assembles, but there was still a meta. Everyone used Vinsanity build or Kawhi or NBA 2K MT Coins even the KD build. And I don't know why people whine about"sweats" any decent sized game will have a competitive community. In most other games, sweats beat you by really, really frustratingly good with the same thing you play as, or can play if you wanted to. McLarens are brought by them to races that are mini-van, essentially.
Dingbest
6 Blog posts
