Implied or Written Employment Contracts: Understanding Their Key Distinctions

When it comes to employment, written employment contracts and implied employment contracts are two primary types of contracts that define the relationship between an employer and employee.

When it comes to employment, written employment contracts and implied employment contracts are two primary types of contracts that define the relationship between an employer and employee. Each has unique characteristics, legal implications, and potential risks. Take a closer look at the top distinctions between written and implied employment agreement template.

Formality and Documentation

A written employment contract is a formal, legally binding document signed by both parties that outlines the terms and conditions of employment. It details specifics like job responsibilities, salary, benefits, termination conditions, and any other important clauses, such as non-compete or confidentiality agreements.

But an implied employment contract does not involve any written documentation. Instead, it arises from the behavior, actions, or verbal statements made by the employer and employee. While not legally documented, implied contracts are recognized by courts in certain cases, particularly if the employer’s actions or statements create a reasonable expectation of employment terms.

Legal Enforceability and Clarity

Written employment contracts offer a high level of legal enforceability and clarity, reducing the chances of misunderstandings. As everything is documented, it is easier to resolve disputes regarding:

  • Payments,
  • Benefits, or
  • Working conditions

Courts tend to uphold written contracts as they provide clear, explicit terms agreed upon by both parties.

However, implied Texas employment contract lacks this formal documentation, making legal disputes more complicated. Since implied contracts are based on actions or verbal statements, proving the specific terms in court can be challenging.

Flexibility and Risk

Written contracts are generally less flexible, as they outline specific terms that both parties must follow. While this structure offers stability, it can also limit the ability of both parties to adapt quickly to changes, such as job role modifications or adjustments to work hours.

Implied contracts, while more flexible, carry more risk for both parties. For employees, implied contracts provide less security, as they are often “at-will,” meaning the employer can terminate the relationship at any time without formal notice. Employers also face potential risks, as implied contracts can lead to legal challenges if employees feel certain promises or expectations were unmet.

Overall, written contracts offer security and clarity, while implied contracts are more flexible but come with greater risks.


Carl Glendon

16 Blog posts

Comments